FROM TIME TO TIME I am aware that
questions are raised about the advisability of clergy offering Spiritual
Direction. Like many priest-directors,
whilst recommending such a ministry to my parishioners, I made it a rule of
thumb never to offer myself in that role: as Sr. Madeleine de Saint-Joseph wrote
to ‘A Cleric’ (Berulle and the French School):
‘First, then, I tell you this, sir,
about the direction of souls. It is very
dangerous to meddle in it. One must be constrained and called to it by God
…’ (p.208)
Her observation points out that
which it is natural to want to help another, such help – especially when
concerned with matters of the Spirit – needs to be approached with humility and
a willingness to not only recognise we’re all ‘sinners on the way’, but that we
all need to be learners in the kingdom.
My
own experience of offering direction began as a lay Franciscan (Society of St. Francis), but it took
me some time to recognise that there’s as much difference between offering a
listening ear, reflective advice and spiritual direction, as there is between
offering to nurse someone when they are ill and being a nurse. For that reason, I sought training on the
Ignatian Spirituality Course, during which I was invited to assist in the
formation of spiritual directors, something that lasted for over 12 years.
In their important book, The
Practice of Spiritual Direction, Fr’s Barry and Connelly SJ define
Christian spiritual direction as: ‘… help given by one Christian to another
which enables that person to pay attention to God’s personal communication to
him or her, to respond to this personally communicating God, to grow in
intimacy with this God, and to live out the consequences of that
relationship’. Another Jesuit, James Keegan, said it is ‘the
contemplative practice of helping another person or group to awaken to the
mystery called God in all of life, and to respond to that discovery in a
growing relationship of freedom and commitment.’ Do all clergy have
that contemplative call? Does it come automatically through the
grace given in Ordination? Or is it, surely, a separate, distinctive
charism, not limited to ordination?
“Priests
may have that gift but that gift needs to be developed, like any talent we have. Somebody could be a born athlete but they
would still have to practice and become good at the sport that they play, and
its like that with the priesthood as well.” (Fr. Greg Cleveland, Obl. BVM)
Whilst
it’s true that clergy need to help parishioners deepen their relationship with
God, there are dangers and pitfalls in so doing. It’s one thing to be asked to preach and
another to be a preacher – unfortunately there are many who don’t really have
that calling or would benefit from proper training. Just so with spiritual direction. Many of us who are deeply involved in the
ministry realise that, if you’re going to offer the ministry of Spiritual
Direction, you need a calling to do so and the humility to know you need some
formation – it doesn’t come as part of the grace of ordination, any more than does
the ability to be an effective preacher or teacher.
Nor
is the ministry to be confused with the Sacrament of Confession (Reconciliation).
In the latter, penitence is required, and the seal is inviolate as the penitent
calls to mind their sins. That is not the case with spiritual direction; it may
be that the directee might be advised to taker a matter top confession and a
penitent to explore a matter in Direction for both have their proper ambit.
Over the years
I’ve had to acknowledge that some people should not be offering this ministry,
and I know some bishops who are deeply concerned with the way many directors
are not supervised in what they do: their naïve approach can be a danger to
others. Much sensitivity is involved in
dealing with another’s soul, for the place where we stand is holy ground. Whoever is prepared to offer this ministry
needs to realise the primary
importance of their own conversatio morum
though their ongoing, deepening relationship with God.
In all the time I’ve given direction, taught its arts and supervised many, I’ve come
to recognise that there is much we need to come to terms with, not least the –
• urge to be too directive;
• temptation to want to ‘rescue’ people or to
focus into ‘problem solving’;
• need for a broad understanding of the
Christian spiritual tradition;
• need to trust in the ‘slow work of God’ in a
directee’s life;
• importance of insights from other therapeutic
disciplines, especially in the areas of transference,
counter-transference and projection and the dangers of rejecting these insights;
• legal issues surrounding the ministry
(aspects of confidentiality, safeguarding etc…);
• importance of knowing how to listen
contemplatively, and the danger of not properly listening;
• temptation to ‘go it alone’ and think we
don’t need help (supervision).
The dynamic between priest and
parishioner can be quite complex. Unlike
the boundaried relationship between confessor and penitent, or director and
directee, this relationship can complicate matters further. Spiritual Direction requires both involved to
feel they are free to bring to the relationship what needs addressing and there
needs to be a certain distance between them.
But the proximity
between priest and parishioner in weekly services, meetings etc. leave both
vulnerable to becoming inappropriately close in many ways, which can be a problem
where, consciously or not, levels of attraction begin to emerge, issues of
confidentiality are involved or any of the host of personality issues occurring
in parishes begin to impinge. It’s for
all these reasons, not least the many psycho-spiritual dynamics involved, it’s
held that clergy ought not to direct members of their congregations.
No comments:
Post a Comment