INTRODUCTION
Anyone working in ordained ministry is involved in
processes which concern the whole of their being as it encounters that which
lies outside of the Self. Our personal
history, faith journey, psychological make-up and personality type all impinge
on who we are and who we are becoming.
These, together with the cultural, religious and environmental worlds we
inhabit have a deep bearing on us and can blind us to the fact that – we are
not the role we inhabit, whatever that may be – husband, mother, doctor,
teacher, artist: clergy, in particular.
All need to be aware of the impact of the role they inhabit and the
effect this has on who they are. It is
easy for a clergy-person to view who they are through the lens of their role,
something that David Brenner observes when he writes:
‘There
is one major form of self-organisation that … serves as a potential
transitional place between the body-centred self and the mind-centred
self. We see this in those whose
identity and consciousness are centred on what they do (vocationally) or can do
(by virtue of talent, training or role) e.g. Mother, physician, poet or
comic. …
The centre of consciousness is still the body because our roles, at
least initially, are still body based.
But movement from the public or material self to the role self involves
broadening the perspective we take on the world and ourselves.
… The question now is “How am I doing in my
role?” But … I am now my role. … No longer am I simply meeting the
expectations of others. T is now a
question of how I am doing in being myself, in being my role … how I am doing
in a role that is “me”. (David
G. Benner: Spirituality and the Awakening
of Self by. p.97. Brazos Press. 2012. This forms part of his reflection on
developmental stages of ‘Human Becoming’ from the ‘Body-Centred Self’, through
the Mind-Centred, Soul-Centred to Spirit-Centred Self)
Who we are is not our role, nor is our ultimate calling –
our vocation – to be equated with that role.
We are, firstly, called by God into a unique and deepening unitive
relationship with the Self, the Other and with God, and this is the proper
arena for Spiritual Direction. Pastoral
Supervision, on the other hand, is concerned with identifying the various
movements that affect the ministry of the ordained person (or anyone who has
become identified with their role) in order to see more clearly how the person
can work from a place of greater freedom.
Whilst there are overlaps
between Spiritual Direction and Supervision each perform a different
function. For the purpose of this
refection I will use the definition of Spiritual
Direction as ‘help given by one
Christian to another which enables that person to pay attention to God's
personal communication to him or her, to respond to this personally
communicating God, to grow in intimacy with this God, and to live out the
consequences of the relationship’. (William A. Barry SJ and William J.
Connelly SJ: The Practice of Spiritual
Direction p.8). Supervision, on the other hand, is ‘a regular, planned intentional and boundaried space in which a
practitioner skilled in supervision (the supervisor) meets with one or more
other practitioners (the supervisees) to look together at the supervisees’
practice which gives the supervisee freedom and safety to explore the issues
arising in their work. It is praxis
based – focusing on a report of work and /or issues that arise in and from the
supervisee’s pastoral practice and attentive to issues of fitness to practice,
skill development, management of boundaries, professional identity and the
impact of the work upon all concerned parties. (Definition
of Pastoral Supervision –The Association of Pastoral Supervisors and
Educators – APSE)
SPIRITUAL DIRECTION
Arguably Spiritual Direction is, therefore, more concerned with PROCESS than CONTENT. Whilst both are important within Spiritual Direction it is, ultimately, the Process by which the Directee encounters God that is the focus of direction. As Barry and Connolly point out: ‘Growth in a relationship requires that I pay attention to the other person. It also requires that I pay attention to what happens inside me when I am in the presence of the other and that I share my reactions with him. … Noticing these reactions is fundamental to growth in the spiritual life, and helping a person notice and communicate them is one of the most fundamental tasks of spiritual direction.’ (‘The Practice of Spiritual Direction’ p.65) Here the word ‘process’ can be used in a number of ways. There is the process that occurs between director and directee; the process that occurs within the Directee; and that which occurs within the director. But, primarily, it is the process that occurs within the Directee as they orientate themselves towards God.
Arguably Spiritual Direction is, therefore, more concerned with PROCESS than CONTENT. Whilst both are important within Spiritual Direction it is, ultimately, the Process by which the Directee encounters God that is the focus of direction. As Barry and Connolly point out: ‘Growth in a relationship requires that I pay attention to the other person. It also requires that I pay attention to what happens inside me when I am in the presence of the other and that I share my reactions with him. … Noticing these reactions is fundamental to growth in the spiritual life, and helping a person notice and communicate them is one of the most fundamental tasks of spiritual direction.’ (‘The Practice of Spiritual Direction’ p.65) Here the word ‘process’ can be used in a number of ways. There is the process that occurs between director and directee; the process that occurs within the Directee; and that which occurs within the director. But, primarily, it is the process that occurs within the Directee as they orientate themselves towards God.
So one way of understanding
the PROCESS of Spiritual Direction, as someone has expressed it, is that of
helping a person notice the movements and counter-movements of the Spirit –
these are deeper than feelings and can be recognised as movements of ‘consolation’
(an increase in faith, hope and love) or ‘desolation’ (a decrease in faith,
hope and love) heard in the Process. CONTENT
is, of course, important for it provides the context in which these ‘movements’
occur. These will involve the story that
is told – that has to unfold – which the Director needs to enable but not focus
on nor seek to analyse, for this isn’t counselling. But the PROCESS concerns how the director
helps directee notice movements of consolation and desolation that lie beneath
the content and which the director will gently encourage the directee to allow
to emerge. This Process is intended to
enable the Directee to encounter the CORE PROCESS which concerns their desire
for God, and God’s desire for them. This
aspect of the Process may be beyond words – biblical, or other images, might
enable this movement as might physical movement – but is rooted in our deepest
desire.*
In all this it’s important to adopt a contemplative rather
than an analytical approach. The
encounter between God and the Directee is holy ground and the role of the
Director is to listen deeply to the narrative (without getting bogged down in
it) as it unfolds in order to elicit the ‘sweep’ and feeling of it; the subtle
shifts, changes and movements. In all
this the Director is not seeking to
solve a problem but to help someone get in touch with what’s happening at a
deeper level – the level of their encounter with the Spirit – to help them
notice what obstacles there may be and where God may be leading them. As Duane
R. Bidwell wrote in Presence: the Journal
of Spiritual Directors International (Vol.
8. no.3. Oct. 2002) ‘A director might be
expected to have knowledge about God and the spiritual journey, but cannot know
precisely how to create spiritual growth or healing for a particular person or
even know for certain what the directee is experiencing in a particular situation. The director has expertise about the process
of spiritual direction, but cannot claim special knowledge about the content of
an individual’s relationship with God or what spiritual practices might lead to
the growth people seek through spiritual direction.’
SUPERVISION
The vocation to priesthood (or clerical ministry) is, as
anyone knows who is exercising such a calling, extremely demanding. According to the Ordination of Priests, also called Presbyters (Church of England) the
calling is to: ‘be servants and shepherds
… to proclaim the word of the Lord and to watch for the signs of God's new
creation. They are to be messengers, watchmen and stewards of the Lord; they
are to teach and to admonish, to feed and provide for his family, to search for
his children in the wilderness of this world's temptations, and to guide them
through its confusions …. Formed by the word, they are to call their hearers to
repentance and to declare in Christ's name the absolution and forgiveness of
their sins…. they are to tell the story of God's love …. to baptize new
disciples … and to walk with them in the way of Christ, nurturing them in the
faith. They are to unfold the Scriptures, to preach the word in season and out
of season, and to declare the mighty acts of God. They are to preside at the
Lord's table and lead his people in worship, offering with them a spiritual
sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving. They are to bless the people in God's
name. They are to resist evil, support the weak, defend the poor, and intercede
for all in need. They are to minister to the sick and prepare the dying for
their death. Guided by the Spirit, they are to discern and foster the gifts of
all God's people, that the whole Church may be built up in unity and faith.’
… and that’s just for starters! But in none of this is there a mention of the
pastoral needs of priests themselves. It
is clear that many clergy carry enormous burdens; the expectations on them,
both external and internal, can mask deeper needs; personal relationships can
become confused and boundaries blurred.
Indeed, for some clergy there are
no boundaries. Finally the role of a
priest can overwhelm, not only the vocation to live out of their priestly
calling but also their identity as a human being, called by God into
relationship with Him. Ultimately, we
should not speak of a calling to
ordained priesthood but, rather, of priesthood as a locus whereby a person is called
to respond more freely to God. The role
of the spiritual direction of priests (and, by extension, anyone who is
responding to a call to exercise pastoral ministry) therefore is to keep their
eyes fixed on the God who is calling them to Himself through the ministry to which they were ordained. Priesthood, like any other vocation within
the Church, provides the context in which a person finds their freedom to seek
God. The danger comes when the context
becomes the focus of the vocation.
Whilst this is particularly true of ordained ministers,
everyone exercising pastoral ministry needs to step back and review the way
they are responding to that context from time to time with someone who can
offer an impartial overview. But, amidst
the pressures of ministry, personal pastoral care is often low-down, if not at
the bottom, of the list and can seem yet another ‘thing that should be
done’. However, by ignoring pastoral
care ministers are setting a bad example!
Formal supervision is a clear requirement in
most secular, pastoral professions and no
comparable professional walk of life leaves the requirement for self-care
absolutely to its own personnel. The
ministry of Pastoral Supervision is intended to address this need: it is a
means of being accountable to ourselves, to our vocation, to the Church through
which that calling has been affirmed and to our God. So what might this involve?
Firstly it should be noted that Supervision is not spiritual accompaniment, counselling
or line-management, for reasons mentioned above. Unlike mentoring, the purpose of which has a
particular focus defined as ‘maximis(ing)the
grace of God in the life of the mentee, through deepening their identity in
Christ, developing them in Christlike character and integrating them more fully
into the body of Christ. To develop
their potential in the service of God’s kingdom purposes through discerning
more clearly God’s direction for their lives.’ (Diocese of Bath and Wells),
the focus of Supervision is the pastoral
needs of the individual. It therefore
compliments the ministry of spiritual direction, which is primarily concerned
with the movement of God within the life of the directee.
Pastoral Supervision, therefore, is about working with
someone to gain an over-view from another view/perspective: to gain a better
vision, extra vision, a further look. It
covers awareness of God, growth in insight and professionalism (good
practice), space to safely explore feelings and to find encouragement and
support. The tasks of Pastoral Supervision
have been described as: Contemplative (Awareness of God); Formative (Growth in
Insight); Normative (Growth in professionalism or good practice); Restorative
(Release and holding of feelings); Affirmative (Encouragement and support).
CONCLUSION
The Spiritual Direction and Pastoral Supervision of priests
are, in a sense, two sides of the same coin.
One side is primarily concerned with the personal vocation of the
priest. By keeping the focus of the
person fixed into the process of their desire for God, the priest is enabled to
realise afresh the One who calls them to Himself. In order to do this, and, maybe, to move the
individual from focussing their attention on the content of their ministry to
the process whereby they realise the movement(s) of the Spirit, it can be
helpful to invite the person to move from their head to their heart. To reflect on images, symbols or dreams; to
invite them to notice what is happening in their bodies or to use the
imagination. And to notice what is
happening in our bodies as we sit
with the person. (Projective
Identification – a psychological term first introduced by Melanie Klein in 1946
to describe what can happen when the client, closed to their feelings, projects
onto the therapist who, in turn, ‘feels’ their feelings of which the client is
unaware.). All this calls for the
Director to be in touch with their own interior movements as the story of the Directee
unfolds. Whilst the Director should not
ignore the content of a Directees ministry (the Director must listen to the context
– the unfolding story) they need to remember that it is not the focus which,
ultimately, concerns the individual’s desire for God.
Pastoral Supervision, on the other hand, has as its focus
the content of the priest’s ministry – the context in which their vocation is
exercised. Both require reflective
practise as those involved work with the content and process of the
encounter.
________________________________________
Give me a candle of the
Spirit, O God,
as I go down into the
depths of my being.
Show me the hidden
things,
the creatures of
forgotten memories and hurts.
Take me down into the
spring of my life,
and tell me my nature
and my name.
Give me freedom to
grow,
so that I may become
that self,
the seed of which you
planted in me at my making.
Out of the depths I cry
to you, O Lord.
Bishop George Appleton
(1902 – 1993)
* Julie Dunstan (Encounter)
No comments:
Post a Comment